Interesting Bible Transalation Chart

I ran across this Bible translation chart. I found it helpful in visually explaining the goal of different English translations. The number in parenthesis is the grade level readability. The chart comes from Lion Track Ministries. I can’t speak to it’s accuracy.

Advertisements

15 Comments

Filed under Bible Transalations

15 responses to “Interesting Bible Transalation Chart

  1. I don't think I'd put the AMP in such a good position on the Word for Word side of the chart.That translation can at times be more like a "choose your own adventure" version; where people can choose a favoured word/phrase option to suit a meaning closest to their own doctrine.It's a useful tool, but not one I would recommend without additional reference to other translations.It's translation of John 3:16 in particular ADDS to the actual text and changes its contextual meaning.

  2. "Choose your own adventure" – great analogy. :) I see your point on how that could be abused. The Amp makes for a nice study tool, but is a real pain for regular reading.

  3. Kevin,It was the bible that I wanted to use for my regular reading because I thought it gave a more accurate translation.However, its format is open to abuse, its translations are not always accurate, and as you say it's a "pain for regular reading".The most accurate bible possible is not necessarily the best bible to depend upon – IF that bible is not practical for reading.Even the best original manuscripts would do most of us no good at all because we don't read the language they were written in. I currently read the TNIV because the edition I have is the best I've found so far for reading. It omits chapter and verse numbers and it arranges the books into a better order, with Acts following Luke, and the OT prophets presented in their correct chronology instead of according to length of book.Both of these features make it MUCH easier to read things in their correct context.Other translations are readily available to clear up any issues regarding the translation itself when it comes to study rather than day to day reading

  4. Hi Onesimus,I currently don't have a TNIV, but would like to get one. I'm currently using the ESV for reading at home. I have found it to be a generally good transalation (despite the fact that it's the Calvinist's favorite). :)

  5. Kevin,The edition of the TNIV that I have goes under the name of "The Books of the Bible".I have found that the text is very similar (identical in parts) to the NIV.My wife and I also use the ESV and haven't noticed any overt Calvinist influences. We use it mainly when listening to the Bible on CD (is that showing my age in this day of ipods and mp3 players? At least I don't listen to it on cassette or vinyl).Tim

    • BibleTeacher

      “The Nearly Inspired Version” – seems a little too influenced by politically correct compromises, esp with pronouns, masculine terms like son, man, etc. I have taught 2nd graders who can figure out the difference between when an individual adult male is referred to and when the reference is to “mankind”, obviously including women. And with the multiplication of more contemporary “readable, street language, pseudo-culturally sensitive” paraphrases — how about we try to “smarten people up instead of dumbing the Bible down”? “Just sayin’.”

  6. I use the ESV most of the time but read some from the NIV and the NKJV. I am thinking of going KJV only.

    • BibleTeacher

      Interesting. I started decades ago in the KJV, then went to NIV because that’s what my church used, but eventually used the NKJV for the more literal translation but without the “thee’s and thou’s” that bothered everyone else. I used the NASB for a while because of the greater formal equivalency. A little while ago I started checking out the ESV, which I like for formal equivalence plus readability. But now I read and study mostly KJV with ESV, NASB and NKJV for additional study. It’s kinda funny how many folks I know have come full circle back to KJV for their main Bible. I am by no means a KJV-Only guy, but I do look to it the most.

  7. Believe it or not while a member of a reformed baptist church one of the men shared as a "great concern" that his nephew was considering buying the TNIV.

  8. Hi Tim, It sounds pretty useful. I have wanted to get a chronological type Bible, maybe I'll add it to my wish list.Roy said:"I am thinking of going KJV only."You're scaring me. :) Bob, That's IS funny. At least the nephew didn't want an NRSV, that would be a clear indication of reprobation. :)

  9. Kevin,It would be funny if it weren't for the fact that at the time I shared his opinion. Oh well, God is good and I am oft the fool.

  10. Hi Tim, It sounds pretty useful. I have wanted to get a chronological type Bible, maybe I'll add it to my wish list.——— Kevin,my bible keeps all of the books intact. Some chronological bibles are a cut and paste job in which the editor determines where a particular part of the bible fits in a chronological history.I also have one of the latter type but never use it.If God saw fit to give us scripture in books, then I'm not too keen on tampering with that choice.Putting the whole books in a more suitable chronological order is another issue. I find that reading the books more or less in the order of writing gives a more coherent perspective.And its surprising how much of a difference the absence of chapter and verse numbers makes.

  11. Hi Tim, I can see how the absence of the chapters would be particularly helpful in the case of Romans 9-11. Calvinists often take 9 in isolation, but it's pretty clear that the three chapters go together as one thought.

  12. So true Kevin, They are very familiar with:“I will have mercy on whom I have mercy” and “It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy”But they don’t bother to read far enough to find that: “God has bound all men over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them ALL”Tim

  13. BibleTeacher

    Very informative site with lots of great resources! Thank you very much, keep up the good work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s